On this SiteGround vs Bluehost comparability, we’re going to pit these two powerhouse providers towards each other to see which comes out on prime. Over 5 rounds, we’ll attempt to decide if SiteGround’s wonderful function listing can beat Bluehost’s unparalleled usability so yow will discover the greatest service for you.
SiteGround ranked on our record of the greatest webhosting suppliers, and for good purpose. Between its no-nonsense pricing, wonderful velocity and lots of features, it’s a great selection for almost any web site. That stated, it was almost knocked out of rivalry by Bluehost in our greatest website hosting for WordPress guide.
This comparison takes place in a vacuum, though. We’ll pull in other providers all through the piece, but we’re targeted on how the rivals stack up towards each other. If you’d like to see how they perform in the real world, read our SiteGround assessment and Bluehost evaluate.
- 1 Setting Up a Battle: SiteGround vs. Bluehost
Setting Up a Battle: SiteGround vs. Bluehost
The comparability will happen over 5 rounds: features, pricing, ease of use, velocity and uptime and safety and privacy. At the beginning of every round, we’ll specify what we’re in search of, then proceed to see how nicely every provider satisfies our standards. At the end, we’ll present our thoughts and declare a winner.
Whichever service wins three or more rounds will take the crown general. That stated, it’s often not that easy, as you possibly can see in our DreamHost vs. Bluehost comparison. Although we attempt our greatest to find the optimum selection for many conditions, we will’t find the best choice for all conditions.
The service you go together with will depend upon what your web site needs. Because of that, we advocate studying via every part utterly so you possibly can understand why we declared the winner we did. In some rounds, the more sensible choice is obvious, but others are more nuanced.
Options are the cornerstone of any good website hosting service. When choosing between providers, it typically comes down to the extras you get because the variations in pricing and velocity are minimal. This round will handle which features are included together with your plan, as well as how useful those options are to growing your website.
When it comes to goodies, there’s no service is sort of like SiteGround. Whereas Hostinger edges it out by a hair, but virtually all different suppliers fall brief (learn our Hostinger assessment). Regardless of which sort or tier of internet hosting you buy, SiteGround ensures that you’ve the necessities to maintain your website functioning while adding a number of extras for the specific service you’re utilizing.
For instance, the managed WordPress plans have an extended record of WordPress-specific options, including staging, Jetpack, SuperCacher and managed updates. Although nothing special for a WordPress-focused net host corresponding to Kinsta (learn our Kinsta evaluate), SiteGround’s low worth level makes the WordPress options shine.
Non-WordPress users aren’t left in the chilly, though. SiteGround, like many net hosts, features a web site builder, nevertheless it’s not a mediocre addition like we saw with 1&1 IONOS (read our 1&1 IONOS evaluation). Slightly, you might have entry to Weebly, which might be the greatest website builder you should purchase, as you possibly can read in our Weebly evaluation.
Outdoors of building tools, the essentials are accounted for, including automated day by day backups, a free SSL/TLS certificate, Cloudflare integration and unlimited e mail addresses at your area. SiteGround consists of the whole lot, and it consists of it throughout all plans. Although specific options are current on certain tiers, the necessities span the vary.
Bluehost is as wonderful when it comes to options. Out of the net hosts Endurance Worldwide Group owns, Bluehost is the most feature-rich, in contrast to, say, iPage (read our iPage evaluate). That stated, you typically have to pay additional for these options, putting Bluehost at a slight disadvantage for this spherical.
Lots of the similar options are present, although. With Bluehost, you possibly can nonetheless use Weebly together with your area at no cost, and WordPress customers nonetheless get staging. Plus, the control panel is constructed for WordPress, making it easier than ever to handle your website.
The goodies are equal, but the necessities aren’t. Though Bluehost gives every day backups, domain privateness, an SSL/TLS certificate and spam prevention, it doesn’t supply all these features across plans. To get CodeGuard, which is a day by day backup device, area privateness and SpamExperts, you’ll want to improve to the costliest shared plan.
That stated, lots of the essentials are included throughout tiers, which most of Bluehost’s EIG siblings can’t boast (learn our FatCow evaluation for an instance). All customers get day by day backups and a free SSL/TLS certificates, which is greater than enough to fulfill us for this spherical.
Spherical One Thoughts
This spherical is one among the closest we’ve had in our comparison articles as a result of Bluehost and SiteGround go blow for blow with their features. Bluehost places up a barrier for some features, however they’re not essential to operating an internet site. Although we tried our best to keep away from it, this spherical goes to have to be a tie.
Round: Features No clear winner, factors for all
Hosting is uncommon when it comes to pricing. Although in, say, our VPN evaluations, we take a look at the worth alone, there are extra elements to contemplate with website hosting, specifically transparency. The business is infamous for deceptive and misleading pricing, which means this round won’t only include the worth you’ll be paying, but in addition how clear that worth is through checkout.
SiteGround isn’t as clear as, say, DreamHost when it comes to pricing, nevertheless it’s higher than most (learn our DreamHost evaluation). As is the case with virtually all net hosts, there’s an introductory price that you simply’ll pay for the preliminary term, which means your monthly worth will bounce when it comes time to renew.
Sadly, there’s no dodging that, but SiteGround helps ease the burden. In contrast to with Arvixe, your month-to-month fee doesn’t change relying on period (learn our Arvixe evaluate). Meaning regardless of for those who buy one, two or three years of shared hosting, you get the similar discounted fee on your initial term.
Although SiteGround’s rates aren’t as low as Hosting24’s (read our Internet hosting24 assessment), they’re in line with what we’d anticipate. That stated, the WordPress plans are the similar worth as the regular shared plans whereas being managed, which makes SiteGround far more engaging than a dear managed WordPress net host, corresponding to Pagely (learn our Pagely assessment).
For those who attempt the service and determine it’s not for you, there’s a 30-day refund window, nevertheless it only applies to shared internet hosting and its variants, corresponding to WordPress and WooCommerce. Cloud plans solely get a 15-day window and devoted internet hosting doesn’t get one. The shorter interval is a letdown compared to InMotion Hosting’s 90-day refund policy (learn our InMotion Internet hosting evaluation).
Glancing by means of both product pages, you’d be forgiven for considering Bluehost and SiteGround value the similar. Whereas sure plans line up, Bluehost’s misleading pricing model means you’ll typically end up paying extra. As with SiteGround, there’s an introductory fee that’ll prevent cash in your preliminary time period, but that fee isn’t static.
The shorter the period you go together with, the greater the worth. The rate advertised, and the price listed above, is simply if you are going to buy three years of internet hosting. Shared packages are only provided in one, two and three-year durations, and a dollar is added to the monthly worth as you step down.
Plus, a number of add-ons are preselected at checkout, which makes your internet hosting package deal much more costly. The ultimate price isn’t clear until checkout, either. When put together, you’re typically paying far more than the competitors, despite the advertised month-to-month fee wanting comparable to these provided by other net hosts.
As for a refund window, Bluehost gives you 30 days like SiteGround. It’s not impressive in contrast to InMotion Internet hosting or A2 Internet hosting (read our A2 Hosting evaluate), however it’s troublesome to complain when SiteGround presents the similar period.
Spherical Two Ideas
Rates, refund home windows and durations are evenly matched for Bluehost and SiteGround. The distinction comes down to how clear the worth is. Bluehost makes you commit to checkout earlier than clarifying that shorter durations value more, whereas SiteGround is obvious all through the course of, making this spherical simple.
Though there’s configuration that needs to be accomplished, you gained’t be accessing your hosting management panel each day. It typically works in the background, and although that’s true, it doesn’t excuse a poorly designed interface. This round, we’ll take a look at how straightforward it’s to handle your hosting package deal, in addition to how easy it’s to get by way of checkout.
As talked about, SiteGround is obvious throughout checkout about the worth you’re paying, which helps ease of use rather a lot. Selecting a hosting package deal is straightforward, too, with a side-by-side comparison of options for each tier of hosting. That stated, the dated management panel puts a damper on the in any other case seamless experience.
The checkout course of is straightforward, in contrast to Namecheap’s, which subjects you to a painfully long checkout (read Namecheap evaluate). When you’re accomplished, you’ll be able to entry the control panel, which permits you to view your account particulars, replace billing info and buy further providers.
It’s in desperate want of a facelift, though. Even finances net hosts, similar to WebHostingBuzz, manage an intuitive and alluring interface, while SiteGround just feels uninteresting and drab (learn our WebHostingBuzz assessment). The performance is there, however a reasonably face doesn’t harm.
Once you find cPanel — it’s a bit of a course of, as you’ll be able to read in our evaluate — the expertise ticks up, but solely barely. cPanel is simply as dated, despite being as usable as some other implementation. The identical verdict applies with it: SiteGround doesn’t restrict your functionality, however more effort in the design would assist.
Bluehost struggles more when it comes to checkout due to the deceptive pricing and preselected add-ons, however the management panel is so wonderful that the grueling process is greater than made up for. After paying in your account, you’ll set your password and proceed to the management panel.
In the event you’re using considered one of our best password managers, although, you’ll have issues. We used LastPass to generate a safe password, however copying and pasting it wouldn’t work (learn our LastPass assessment). It appears that evidently on the password creation display, you possibly can only sort in your password, which is ridiculous contemplating how useful and widespread password managers are.
Thankfully, these issues are shortly forgotten when you hit the control panel. Bluehost makes use of a modified cPanel to mix your billing and internet hosting administration right into a single interface, and it really works so nicely that Bluehost earned a spot on our greatest website hosting with cPanel guide.
That stated, WordPress users will discover the management panel the most useful. Bluehost allows you to handle many points of your WordPress website from the management panel, together with plugins and themes. Plus, you possibly can set up staging on your WordPress website without logging in to the WordPress back-end.
Spherical Three Ideas
Bluehost stumbles by way of checkout, while SiteGround is rock strong. You’ll only want to endure checkout once, though, and Bluehost has the clear edge as soon as the cost has been processed. Though SiteGround has the similar performance, Bluehost exhibits that a trendy interface can go a great distance in usability.
Of all the areas we take a look at with hosting providers, velocity and uptime is probably the most necessary. We use two instruments to gauge an internet host’s velocity: Pingdom Velocity Check and Load Influence. Between them, we will see not only how shortly the web site masses, but in addition how nicely it performs when multiple customers try to access it at the similar time.
SiteGround is considered one of the fastest net hosts we’ve tested. It earned a 96 out of 100 from Pingdom Velocity Check, largely thanks to SuperCacher. That in-house caching software significantly cuts down on load occasions, which is particularly useful for database-driven websites, comparable to these using WordPress.
As you possibly can see in the chart above, SiteGround had an extended load time, however most of that was due to DNS decision, which simply means the area provider we have been using — in this case, GoDaddy (read our GoDaddy assessment) — was sluggish. The “wait” metric, which is most necessary, accounted for little time.
Shifting on, we used Load Influence to ship 50 digital customers to the server over the course of 5 minutes. As the customers pile up, we would like to see the net host return little to no HTTP errors and keep a constant response time. As you possibly can see in the graph under, SiteGround was up to the activity.
SiteGround additionally has the most generous uptime guarantee we’ve seen. You’re guaranteed 99.9 % uptime, down to 99 %. When you fall in that vary, you’ll receive a month of free hosting. Each proportion level under that additionally awards you a free month of hosting, which is superb.
Bluehost carried out nicely in our velocity check, too, but not as well as SiteGround. It scored a 94 out of 100, with twice as much time given to the “wait” metric. Although inferior to SiteGround, Bluehost is faster than most hosting providers, which means you’ll be able to obtain optimal performance with it so long as you comply with our how to enhance website loading occasions information.
Like SiteGround, it was a whole lot of caching happening, although it appears SuperCacher performs better, if only barely. You’ll be able to improve your load occasions on a platform akin to WordPress by putting in a further caching plugin (learn our beginner’s guide to utilizing WordPress to find out how).
We ran the similar Load Impression check on Bluehost as we did on SiteGround, however with much totally different results. Bluehost had a excessive variety of HTTP errors throughout, suggesting there are too many customers stuffed onto the server. For much of the time, our web site had a 0-millisecond response time, which means the consumer couldn’t access it.
That combined with the uptime guarantee, or lack thereof, ends this spherical on a low word. Bluehost cites the “complexity” of shared hosting as a purpose not to guarantee uptime. As we stated in our evaluate, although, if other net hosts can supply an uptime assure, an internet host of Bluehost’s caliber should give you the option to, as nicely.
Spherical 4 Ideas
Though the Pingdom Velocity Check outcomes for both providers are evenly matched, SiteGround has a transparent edge when it comes to the uptime assure and our Load Impression check. You will get comparable velocity with Bluehost, however you’ll in all probability need to upgrade to a costlier plan to see comparable load dealing with to SiteGround.
Our fifth and last round will take a look at the security measures SiteGround and Bluehost embrace, as well as how involved they’re with defending your privacy. Between these two areas, we will see how properly every net host not only protects your web site from threats, but in addition how it protects you.
SiteGround has a superb record of security measures, particularly for shared users. One concern with shared hosting is that a dangerous apple can infect the lot, with malware shifting to other websites on the server. SiteGround uses remoted directories for each of its web sites, though, which means one contaminated website gained’t spoil the rest.
Plus, an awesome security package deal is included. The trifecta of security measures are present, which means you get day by day backups, malware scanning and a free SSL/TLS certificate. There’s an internet software firewall, AI-driven anti-bot system and SpamExperts, too.
SiteGround says it gained’t “sell, rent, share or otherwise disclose personally identifiable information for commercial purposes in any way.” It doesn’t get much clearer than that. Though SiteGround collects normal info from you, that info isn’t used for profit, which a whole lot of net hosts can’t say (read our HostGator assessment for extra on that).
Bluehost has a strong record of security measures, in contrast to its EIG siblings. It consists of free day by day backups throughout plans, in addition to an SSL/TLS certificate. Lots of the server-side security measures are unclear, although, despite our makes an attempt at clarification.
We asked a number of occasions a few net software firewall, distributed denial-of-service assault prevention and server-side malware protection. Though most net hosts embrace these features, Bluehost dodged the question. We’d like to consider these features are present as a result of they often are, but we will’t say for positive.
The privacy is far more concerning, although. As talked about, Bluehost is owned by EIG, which is dangerous for privacy. Area privacy prices additional and your private info is handled as an asset slightly than delicate knowledge.
EIG can share info with Google, Fb, Verizon, WP Beginner, Bing and extra, which is outlined in its in depth privacy coverage. There’s loads of legal jargon, however no amount of smoke and mirrors can mask that EIG is in the enterprise of selling your knowledge. For those who’re concerned about privacy, Bluehost, as well as all different EIG manufacturers, ought to be your last consideration.
Round Five Thoughts
SiteGround is best on security and privacy than Bluehost, regardless of Bluehost together with greater than its EIG siblings. Although Bluehost isn’t dangerous in most regards, its privacy is abysmal, pushing SiteGround into the winner’s chair in this last spherical.
With three wins and one tie, SiteGround is our champion. The first few rounds noticed an in depth battle between the two, but as the comparability continued, it turned clear that SiteGround was superior. Although not leaps and bounds higher, it has sufficient slight advantages to be an general better net host.
What killed Bluehost, though, was its privacy. As you possibly can see in our website hosting evaluations, all EIG brands lose large points for privateness, which is a bummer considering Bluehost is a strong choice in any other case.
Do you agree that SiteGround is the better choice? If not, why do you want Bluehost? Let us know in the feedback under and, as all the time, thanks for reading.